Two black people assault, taser, kill and dismember a white guy in Philly. They were joined by a white prostitute.
These are just some of the hundreds of examples of racial violence and lawlessness in more than 80 cities around the country as documented in my book: White Girl Bleed a Lot: The return of racial violence to America.
Thomas Sowell said : ”Reading Colin Flaherty’s book made painfully clear to me that the magnitude of this problem is greater than I had discovered from my own research. He documents both the race riots and the media and political evasions in dozens of cities.” – National Review.
Get it here:
Please follow and like us:
fixed!
You may want to review this story again my friend. I am from the Philadelphia TriState area and three black people did not murder a white man. A black pimp, a white prostitute and a black prostitute murdered and dismembered a white “john” that just happened to be a frequent customer (honestly until there is a full investigation we won’t even know how deeply the victim was involved with these people— if you can even call them people).
By no means did Francis deserve to die in this manner, but he was involved in some pretty dirty business with shady characters. The oddest part of your interest in this story is its been no secret in the media that two of the murderers were black. Instead it’s almost impossible to find a media outlet or forum willing to show a picture of the white women involved in the murder. I only saw a picture of her this morning on Good Day Philadelphia.
“three black people did not murder a white man. A black pimp, a white prostitute and a black prostitute murdered and dismembered a white “john”
You seem to be twisting things a bit much here, yourself, and dare I say purposely, as opposed to Colin’s more likely accidentally. What you should have written to be accurate, was, two black people and one white personMURDERED a white man. Does the fact that the white man was visiting a prostitute somehow justify that prostitute murdering him? You seem to do the typical “No!…but, Yes!” semantic routine here. You also can’t get that murder is murder? The dismemberment happened, so far as reports say as of now, *after* the MURDER. It wasn’t gee, let’s just cut off this person’s, legs, arms even head(?) just for fun. But we really didn’t want to kill him!
Since you are clearly invested in distorting in such a profound and obscene manner, I’ll mention that your assertion that the one woman perp was white remains to be proven. After all, I’m not ‘white hispanic,’ ya know, just White.
Sorry mate, but your rebuttal makes no sense. #1. My point in referencing these individuals relationship (through the sex trade) was to bait people like you, by grandstanding in the same manner Colin did. I wanted to make the argument, If it’s not important I mention a pimp, two pros and a john, why is it so important for Colin to mention the race of the murderers, and leave out the fact one was white? The difference is my attempts to grandstand, omitted no facts and was sarcastic at best. Thanks for taking the bait.
Semantics…you’re the only person using semantics here. You stated it would be more accurate for me to write, “two black people and one white person MURDERED a white man”,(not sure why you capitalized “murdered” as if I suffer from the same inability to comprehend what I read, as you do). You and I are essentially
saying the same thing using real details from the story. Colin is omitting details to fit his agenda. “So who, is really invested in distorting a profound and obscene manner” as you say.
The cavalcade of baseless nonsense you wrote in response to me was bizarre. The white Hispanic comment (hilarious) was odd and according to your logic the two blacks could be Melanesian. That Hispanic comment truly speaks volumes to your racial proclivities which could open an entirely different discussion. Face it champ, not one media outlet reported all the suspects were black or gave reference to their race besides the pictures they provided. So Colin’s omission is one hell of a mistake.
I am really playing devils advocate here. Stephanie Foulke’s image was the only one hard to find in the media as of
yesterday and this case has remained the top news story here in the Delaware Valley. So my question is, why Colin is mentioning the case at all and omitting details. If not to tell the story of a man who was brutally murdered by three animals. I find Colin’s misinterpretation of details and your flawed rebuttal, abhorrent.
I don’t debate with liars, nor people who conveniently edit what they wrote so they can avoid taking responsibility for their actual words, which is what I can see you’ve done. .
The reality is, the fact that this man was visiting a prostitute in no way shape or form justifies or mitigates the fact that these people murdered him.
If you don’t feel that the races of the perps and victim matter, please inform all main stream media outlets while you’re ‘bating’ people.
“I don’t debate with liars, nor people who conveniently edit what they wrote so they can avoid taking responsibility for their actual words, which is what I can see that you’ve done”. .
Yawn! give it up looser I held a mirror up, to show you what you are I am sorry you don’t like what you see. I am baiting you to answer my question of why Stephanie Foulke’s picture was not presented by mainstream media outlets and why Colin feels this story can be used as an example of his ideology. That’s what someone who plays devils advocate does. Odd how you speak of editing when I’ve edited nothing and your friend Colin has edited the original title his post. What I said, was what is said and you continue to prove you have a basic lack of comprehension.
chris lane was murdered by TWO BLACKS & one white. still black on white crime. same here: TWO BLACKS & one white, same thing. in general colin includes all the details. see his 100’s of examples of black on white crime. he dosnt need to distort facts, the media does that.